Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations
Understanding
the Financial Statement Impact
By
Robert E. Guinn, Richard G. Schroeder, and Suzanne K. Sevin
DECEMBER
2005 - In February 1994, Edison Electric Institute asked FASB
to add a project to its agenda to address accounting for nuclear
decommissioning and other similar costs. The result was SFAS
143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,
issued in June 2001. In releasing the standard, FASB noted
that because existing practice concerning accounting for all
obligations associated with the removal of long-lived assets
was inconsistent, SFAS 143 was written with the broader intent
of covering all asset retirement obligations (ARO).
When
SFAS 143 was issued, concern was voiced over the economic
consequences to the companies that its provisions affect.
Some suggested that companies would be required to record
materially increased expenses as well as increases in assets
and liabilities that might be large enough to negatively
impact commonly used financial ratios such as the return
on assets, debt-equity ratio, and operating profit ratio.
This study examines the financial statement effect of the
adoption of SFAS 143 on a sample of public companies.
SFAS
143’s Objective
The
objective of SFAS 143 is to establish accounting standards
for the recognition and measurement of obligations attributable
to the removal of assets as well as to their associated
restoration costs. This obligation is to be recorded in
the period in which the liability meets FASB’s definition
of a “probable future sacrifice of economic benefits
arising from a present obligation,” and in which its
amount can be reasonably measured. Uncertainty with respect
to the timing or method of settlement that is conditional
on future occurrences does not affect the recognition of
the liability but may be factored into its measurement.
The
obligation must be recorded at fair value, which represents
the amount that a third party would require to assume the
liability. If an active market for these obligations does
not exist, the company must use the expected present value
technique outlined in Statement of Financial Accounting
Concepts 7, Using Cash Flow Information and Present
Value in Accounting, which results in measuring the
asset’s and related liability’s present value
by using each company’s credit-adjusted rate.
When
a company first adopts the standard, a liability is recorded
for the present value of the future removal of the applicable
asset as well as for the associated restoration costs. The
asset’s carrying value is increased by the capitalized
cost and, depending on prior accounting treatment, further
adjusted for previously recorded depreciation. The offsetting
adoption entry is recorded as a change in accounting principle
(CAP) cumulative effect adjustment and is reflected on the
income statement.
Asset
and liability amounts under SFAS 143 result in depreciation
and accretion expenses each year. The capitalized asset
retirement cost is allocated in a systematic and rational
manner as depreciation expense over the estimated useful
life of the asset. The depreciation charge is calculated
as the increased asset base divided by the asset’s
useful life on the date of adopting SFAS 143. Accretion
expense is calculated by multiplying the balance of the
recorded liability by the company’s credit-adjusted
discount rate each year, and is simply the amortization
of the present value discount associated with the ARO’s
initial recording. Accretion expense is offset with an increase
to the liability account, and, at the end of the asset’s
life, the liability account will have a balance equal to
the amount needed to settle the retirement obligation. If
any of the original assumptions change, a recalculation
of the obligation and subsequently associated expenses should
be recorded as a change in accounting estimate, which is
then offset by an increase in the asset’s value, less
any accumulated depreciation.
Disclosure
requirements of SFAS 143 include the following:
-
A description and the amount of increase of the ARO liability
and associated asset;
-
The amount of the change in accounting principle resulting
from the adoption of the new standard; and
-
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending carrying
amounts, showing separately other changes attributable
to:
-
Liabilities incurred in the current period;
-
Liabilities settled in the current period;
-
Accretion expense; and
-
Revisions in estimated cash flow whenever there is a change
in one or more of the components during an accounting
period.
Accounting
for SFAS 143 Adoption
To
illustrate the accounting for application of SFAS 143, assume
a company purchased an asset with a useful life of 25 years
for $500,000 on January 1, 1985, and assume that the company
had not established a provision for retirement costs in
valuing its assets and liabilities prior to the effective
date of SFAS 143. On January 1, 2003, when the standard
became effective, the company must use current information
to assess whether an ARO exists. Exhibit
1 indicates that an ARO of $175,000 existed on the date
the asset was acquired. According to SFAS 143, the present
value of this amount should have been capitalized and recorded
as a liability on January 1, 1985. Using the company’s
credit-adjusted discounted rate of 13% would have resulted
in an ARO of $8,243 being recorded on January 1, 1985, when
the asset was acquired, with a corresponding increase in
the capitalized retirement cost of $8,243. Subsequently,
the company should have recorded annual accretion expense
of 13% of the current carrying value of the liability and
additional depreciation expense of $330 each year.
Exhibit
1 illustrates the result of these adjustments, assuming
no accounting treatment for asset retirement obligations
prior to adopting SFAS 143. Upon adopting the standard on
January 1, 2003, an asset book value of $142,303 (which
is $2,303 greater than the amount of the book value of the
asset without the ARO cost) and a related liability of $74,386
are recognized. Recording these amounts on the effective
date of SFAS 143 results in an increase in the book value
of assets of $2,303, which consists of the difference between
capitalized retirement costs of $8,243 and an increase in
accumulated depreciation of $5,940, an increase in ARO of
$74,386, and a negative cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle of $72,083. Thereafter, depreciation
expense is increased by $330 for each of the remaining seven
years of the asset’s life, and accretion expense is
recorded each year by multiplying the carrying value of
the ARO by the company’s credit adjusted interest
rate of 13%. Exhibit 1 discloses the result of these calculations
and the journal entry for the adoption of SFAS 143 on January
1, 2003.
The
cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle
is dependent on whether companies have recognized and depreciated
estimated retirement costs prior to adopting SFAS 143. As
indicated in Exhibit 1, the company is assumed not to have
recorded or depreciated retirement costs from 1985 through
2002, and thus, the cumulative effect of adopting of adopting
SFAS 143 on January 1, 2003, resulted in a loss of $72,083.
This loss reflects the catch-up effect related to depreciation
and accretion expenses for the prior 18 years. Exhibit
2 shows that if the company had capitalized and depreciated
retirement costs of $175,000 during the first 18 years,
and recorded the liability at its total future amount, the
cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 143 would be a gain of
$53,917. This gain results from the differences between
depreciation on the undiscounted retirement costs ($175,000)
and the depreciation and accretion expenses relative to
the discounted retirement cost and the related liability
($8,243).
Survey
Objectives
SFAS
143 became effective for all companies whose fiscal years
began after June 15, 2002, and consequently, December 31,
2003, was the first reporting date for most companies under
its provisions. To determine the impact of SFAS 143, the
authors selected a random sample of 1,000 U.S. public companies
from the Russell 300 Index (excluding non–calendar
year-end companies and financial institutions). The
research addressed the following questions:
-
What percentage of U.S. companies was impacted by SFAS
143 adoption at December 31, 2003?
-
What industries were most affected by SFAS 143 adoption?
-
What is the financial statement impact of required SFAS
143 accounting as a—
-
percent of total assets?
-
percent of total liabilities?
-
What is the impact on earnings of recording accretion
expense?
-
What is the impact on earnings of recording the cumulative
prior effect associated with SFAS 143?
Results
The
2003 SEC Form 10-K reports for each of the 1,000 sample
companies were reviewed to determine if they included AROs.
Exhibit
3 indicates that 105 sample companies (10.5%) were affected
by the adoption of SFAS 143 for their existing asset retirement
obligations and that the affected companies were concentrated
in only a few industries [classified by Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC)]. The majority were in metal and mining
(58) and in transportation and
utilities (36).
Exhibit
4 provides an indication of the impact of SFAS 143 on
the surveyed companies’ financial statements. Reviews
of financial statements revealed that some companies did
not provide all of the information required by SFAS 143.
Ninety-seven of the 105 companies disclosed the amount of
their AROs, and 83 disclosed the increase in the ARO-related
asset. Eighty-two of the 97 sample companies that reported
ARO amounts disclosed the amount of 2003 accretion expense,
and 86 disclosed the amount of the change in accounting
principle resulting from SFAS 143 adoption. It is possible
that those amounts that were not disclosed may have been
considered immaterial by management.
As
reported in Exhibit 4, Panel A, of the 97 sample companies
that reported changes in liabilities associated with SFAS
143 adoption, 93 reported an increase, while four reported
a decrease. Of the 83 sample companies that reported changes
in assets, 81 reported an increase, and two reported a decrease.
Additional data suggest that, during 2003, the average increase
in liabilities associated with reporting AROs was 4.0%,
with a range of 0.1% to 34.8%, and that the average increase
in ARO-related assets was 2.6%, with a range of 0.1% to
29.8%.
Exhibit
4, Panel B, reports the impact of SFAS 143 adoption on the
2003 income statements of sample companies, specifically
with respect to accretion expense as a percentage of income
from continuing operations and with respect to the associated
CAP as a percentage of net income. Eighty-two companies
disclosed the information necessary to determine SFAS 143’s
impact of accretion expense on 2003 income. Of these, 71
reported positive income from continuing operations, while
11 reported negative income from continuing operations.
For companies with positive income from continuing operations,
the average impact of 2003 accretion expense was 6.7%, with
a range of 0.1% to 86.7%. For those companies reporting
a net loss from continuing operations, the impact of accretion
averaged 5.1%, with a range of 0.1% to 19.5%.
Exhibit
4 also reflects that 86 of the 105 sample companies reported
a cumulative effect from a CAP as the result of adopting
SFAS 143. Forty-four of the 86 reported a positive impact
on earnings, with an average impact of 8.9% and a range
of 0.1% to 65.7%. Forty-two of the 86 reported a negative
impact on earnings. The average impact for those companies
was 16.7%, with a range of 0.1% to 96.7%.
The average increases in assets and liabilities were 2.6%
and 4.0%, respectively. Further untabulated analysis of
the data indicates that these results are driven by a few
companies that had very large increases in assets and liabilities,
as evidenced by (unreported) median increases in assets
and liabilities of 1.3% and 2.6%, respectively.
While
the percentage increases in expenses are somewhat higher,
further examination of the results leads to a similar conclusion.
The average accretion impact of approximately 6% was distorted
by the results reported by a few companies. The median reported
accretion expense as a percentage of income from continuing
operations was 2.1%.
SFAS
143 does not require companies to specifically identify
the change in depreciation expense attributable to the standard’s
adoption. None of the companies surveyed disclosed this
information, and therefore the impact of depreciation expense
on income relative to capitalized retirement costs could
not be specifically determined. It is possible, however,
to make some observations concerning the depreciation effect.
The
relationship of each company’s accretion and depreciation
expenses will depend on the age and life of its assets,
as well as on the company’s credit-adjusted rate.
When attempting to assess the change in depreciation charges,
the situation illustrated in Exhibits 1 and 2 may not be
representative of the companies contained in the sample,
for two reasons. First, the depreciation period is probably
much longer than 25 years. (For example, nuclear power generators
are generally depreciated over 40-year periods.) Second,
the interest rate used in the example, 13%, may be lower
or higher than the actual credit-adjusted rates applicable
to the sample companies. When valuing its AROs upon the
adoption of SFAS 143, a company must use its credit-adjusted
discount rate on the date the asset was first acquired,
and accordingly, the rate applied is influenced by the age
of the applicable assets. Interest
rates have declined substantially over the past 25 years.
The 30-year Treasury bond rate has decreased from 11.98%
at December 31, 1980, to 5.46% at December 31, 2000.
The
average accretion expense reported by the sample was 12.8%,
suggesting that the assets subject to SFAS 143 reporting
were acquired in the early 1980s, and providing the rationale
for the scenario set forth in Exhibits 1 and 2. Exhibit
5, Panel A, reflects the incremental amount of depreciation
and accretion expenses attributable to SFAS 143 adoption,
based on the Exhibit 1 data.
This
exhibit indicates that when capitalized retirement costs
are allocated over long periods of time and the depreciation
rate is lower than the discount rate, the incremental depreciation
expense associated with the standard will be less than the
applicable accretion expense, and that the difference widens
over time. Because the credit-adjusted discount rate used
in the calculation has an effect on incremental depreciation
and accretion expenses, Exhibit
5, Panel B, reflects the same scenario, assuming a credit-adjusted
rate of 8%. Lower discount rates result in a larger amount
of capitalized retirement cost and, therefore, a higher
amount of annual depreciation. Additionally, the initial
ARO will be relatively higher, resulting in lower total
accretion expense over the ARO’s estimated life. Due
to these combined effects, a lower discount rate will also
cause the cumulative effect of a change to SFAS 143 to result
in a larger loss or a smaller gain.
Discussion
The
results of this study indicate that much of the concern
over the SFAS 143 requirement to capitalize AROs and to
record additional expenses appears to be unfounded. Findings
based on a random sample suggest that only approximately
10% of all U.S. public companies are affected by the standard’s
reporting requirements, and that, on average, the companies
affected by this pronouncement reported relatively minor
changes in assets, liabilities, and expenses. Some
companies, however, did experience significant financial
reporting effects, both positive and negative. For example,
one coal mining company recorded an 86% positive change
on income resulting from the change to SFAS 143, and a $44
million (27%) decrease in its recorded liability due to
changing the measurement of the expected liability from
an undiscounted amount to its present value. For other companies,
the impact was significantly negative. One oil and gas extraction
company recorded a 10% increase in its liabilities, a 6%
increase in its assets, and a 15% increase in its expenses
due to SFAS 143, because the company had previously recorded
the estimated costs of AROs as part of depreciation and
depletion without recording a separate liability for the
amounts. The companies most significantly affected by SFAS
143 appear concentrated in the coal mining, oil and gas
mining, and oil and gas services industries.
A particularly
interesting finding is the fairly even percentage of companies
experiencing increasing versus decreasing cumulative effect
adjustments. As Exhibit 1 illustrates, income-decreasing
CAPs result when no provision had previously been made in
the accounting records for those retirement costs, while
income-increasing CAPs result primarily when companies had
previously included the asset’s retirement costs in
the depreciable base (Exhibit 2). Forty-seven percent (42
companies) reported a positive impact on earnings associated
with the standard, suggesting that many companies had incorporated
retirement obligations into their accounting records prior
to the issuance of SFAS 143.
A close
examination of the requirements of SFAS 143 and the results
of the study indicate that the proper disclosure of AROs
is a complex issue. Inherent in the calculation of the ARO
and its related asset cost are numerous assumptions and
judgments, including the estimated life of the property
to be retired, settlement amounts, inflation factors, credit-adjusted
discount rates, timing of settlement, and changes in the
legal, regulatory, and environmental landscapes. These assumptions
and judgments must be carefully evaluated to ascertain their
appropriateness.
Robert
E. Guinn, PhD, CPA, is an associate professor of
accounting,
Richard G. Schroeder, PhD, CPA, is a professor
of accounting, and
Suzanne K. Sevin, PhD, CPA, is an assistant
professor of accounting, all at the University of North Carolina
at Charlotte.
|