|  |  |  |  | Connecting 
                the DotsOCTOBER 2007 
                - Over the past year, this column has addressed two major public 
                policy issues that may seem, at first, to have little to do with 
                one another. One issue—the estate tax (covered in September 
                2006)—is the on-again, off-again tax imposed on the estates 
                of high-net-worth taxpayers after death. The other—Social 
                Security (covered in February 2007)—is the rapidly depleting 
                trust fund originally intended to spare hard-working Americans 
                from living out their golden years in poverty. Both the estate 
                tax and Social Security are “tax issues” to be sure, 
                but they are not often connected in minds or debate.The Estate Tax and Social Security
 The issues 
                do, however, have similarities. Both were once hot topics in Washington, 
                D.C., but have since fallen from the national spotlight. And—despite 
                this recent lack of attention—both present challenges that 
                will continue to worsen unless something is done soon.  The estate 
                tax policy, for example, is in desperate need of consistency. 
                Since the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act was 
                passed in 2001, a divisive, politically charged debate has placed 
                the status of the tax in constant doubt. The federal government 
                never tires of tinkering with it—or at least talking about 
                tinkering with it, which in fact seems to be the norm, not the 
                exception. As it now stands, estates worth $2 million or less 
                are excluded from the tax, but in 2009 this exclusion will increase 
                to $3.5 million. Moreover, estate tax rates will decrease from 
                a top rate of 46% this year to 45% next year through 2009. In 
                2010, the estate tax will be repealed in its entirety, but—in 
                a bizarre twist—in 2011 the tax will return, to pre-2001 
                levels (an exclusion of $1 million and a top rate of 55%). Social Security, 
                on the other hand, is consistent in its desperate need of funds. 
                According to the best estimates of the Congressional Budget Office’s 
                Social Security trustees in 2005, the Social Security trust fund 
                balance will peak in the year 2017. Subsequently, assuming no 
                policy changes, this trust fund will steadily decline until it 
                is fully depleted in 2041. Once the Social Security trust fund’s 
                assets are depleted, other tax revenues will be needed to keep 
                benefits at currently scheduled levels; Social Security taxes 
                will be able to fund only about three-quarters of its benefit 
                obligations. Give 
                a Little, Take a Little Perhaps there 
                is another connection to be made between the estate tax and Social 
                Security. What if the two policies could, in essence, be addressed 
                with a single remedy?  Let’s 
                say Congress were to firm up the estate tax by choosing one rate 
                and one exemption, and index both of them for inflation. Estate 
                tax monies—which are, after all, taxes to be used for the 
                public good—would then be directed to one of our most important 
                (and needy) public goods: Social Security. The estate tax would 
                get a much-needed measure of consistency, and Social Security 
                would get a necessary infusion of funds.  According 
                to a 2005 report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 
                (a nonpartisan organization working at the federal and state levels 
                on fiscal policy and public programs that affect low- and moderate-income 
                families and individuals), “The Chief Actuary of the Social 
                Security Administration has estimated that maintaining the estate 
                tax at the 2009 levels—with a $3.5 million exemption and 
                a 45 percent top rate—would raise enough revenue to cover 
                more than one-quarter of the shortfall in the Social Security 
                Trust Fund over the next 75 years, as measured by the Social Security 
                Trustees. The trustees estimate the shortfall to be 0.65 percent 
                of GDP, while the revenue raised by this reform would equal 0.2 
                percent of GDP. The Congressional Budget Office projects a smaller 
                shortfall (0.36 percent of GDP). Under CBO assumptions, the estate 
                tax revenues collected under this reform would close about half 
                of the 75-year shortfall.” Sound too 
                good to be true? Let me know your thoughts at lgrumet@nysscpa.org. 
                 
                Louis GrumetPublisher, The CPA Journal
 Executive Director, NYSSCPA
 lgrumet@nysscpa.org
 
 |                               |