Perseverance
Brings Results: Improving Accountability
AUGUST
2005 - The New York State Legislature accomplished much
this year. First, it passed the state budget on time for
the first time in more than 20 years. This gave it time
to thoughtfully and thoroughly deal with other important
issues, including reforming the financial management of
school districts.
In
early June, shortly before their summer recess began, the
New York State Senate and Assembly passed a bill, sponsored
by Assemblyman Thomas DiNapoli, which at press time was
awaiting Governor Pataki’s signature. (Senator Stephen
Saland had sponsored an identical bill in the Senate.) New
York State school districts will be required to: have audit
committees; conduct regular internal audits; ensure that
school board and audit committee members receive training
in their financial oversight responsibilities; seek competitive
bids for outside auditors; and have school board audits
presented at public meetings. The bill draws heavily from
the five-point plan drafted by N.Y. State Comptroller Alan
Hevesi’s School Accountability Coalition, in which
the NYSSCPA participated.
Grassroots
Activism Played Key Role
Because
a CPA firm was considered part of the problem at the Long
Island school districts whose financial scandals and alleged
audit failures were the impetus for these bills, it is appropriate
and noteworthy that CPAs have been part of a solution that
improves both transparency and accountability in the financial
management of the state’s school districts. The Assembly
bill involved well-considered compromises on a number of
points. For example, the original proposal was changed to
eliminate the requirement of the rotation of lead and reviewing
partners every five years on school district audits, with
an additional five years if the district determines that
another auditor within a reasonable geographic area would
not be available. Many NYSSCPA members had expressed concern
that any mandatory auditor rotation would have been harmful
to small and mid-sized school districts.
Throughout
the months leading up to the votes in early June, many NYSSCPA
chapters, members, and members’ firms contacted and
communicated with legislators concerning these proposals.
The Mid-Hudson and Buffalo Chapters have held legislative
breakfasts. In May, NYSSCPA members, including past and
current officers, met with state legislators and legislative
staff at a joint Nassau–Suffolk Chapter breakfast;
a specific area of discussion was mandatory rotation.
Work
Continues in Accountancy Reform
The
Assembly and Senate have also passed separate but similar
bills that would be the first substantive update in some
60 years to the state’s regulation of the practice
of accountancy. Both bills would establish a peer review
program and would make CPE mandatory for all CPAs, not only
those in public practice. Both bills also expand the currently
limited scope-of-practice provisions, although in different
ways. The Assembly bill has conflict-of-interest provisions,
while the Senate bill has substantial-equivalency provisions
that would facilitate CPA practice across state lines. The
Assembly bill would also extend some Sarbanes-Oxley Act
provisions to auditors of publicly traded corporations and
to government entities not currently covered by the federal
law. It would also allow non-CPAs to perform compilations,
as long as they don’t hold themselves out to be CPAs,
a provision that the NYSSCPA has opposed.
The
NYSSCPA will be talking to the New York Legislature to see
how we can bring these two bills together and have the first
meaningful modernization of accounting legislation in more
than five decades.
Louis
Grumet
Publisher, The CPA Journal
Executive Director, NYSSCPA
lgrumet@nysscpa.org
|