Welcome to Luca!globe
 The CPA Journal Online Current Issue!    Navigation Tips!
Main Menu
CPA Journal
FAE
Professional Libary
Professional Forums
Member Services
Marketplace
Committees
Chapters
     Search
     Software
     Personal
     Help
June 1995

International accounting standards: a status report (1995).(Accounting)

by Orsini, Larry L.

    Abstract- Accountants can no longer ignore the need to familiarize themselves with international accounting standards in light of recent multinational agreements. The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, the Instituto Mexicano de Contatores Publicos and the FASB agree that there is a need for International Accounting Standards (IASs). The International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) should prove helpful in the understanding and the development of IASs. Its publication called 'International Accounting Standards, 1994' contains IAS revisions which went into effect last Jan. 1, 1995. The IASC has also moved to gradually eliminate alternative accounting treatments through a series of benchmark recommendations. These proposals are designed to increase the comparability of financial statements around the world.

The IASs have recently undergone unprecedented change. In 1987, IASC began its Comparability/Improvements Project (the Project). The Project's objective was to reduce or eliminate existing alternative accounting treatments and to make other improvements to international standards. As a result of the project, approximately one-third of the IASs were revised. The revisions became effective for accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 1995. Table 1 lists the 29 standards that existed prior to the recent revisions and identifies the 10 that changed. Unlike FASB pronouncements, IASC does not assign new numbers when revising standards. The most significant change in the revised IASs is the committee's specification of "benchmark treatment" and "allowed alternative treatment" whenever a choice TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE 1 OMITTED TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE 2 OMITTED! of accounting methods is permitted. Prior to the Project, the IASs did not specify any preference. This specification of preferences by the committee may prove to be a practical way of eventually eliminating some of the allowed alternatives.

Table 2 shows the major changes made, indicating both benchmark and alternative treatment with a comparison to U.S. GAAP.

An Important Step Toward Harmonization

The internationalization effort to harmonize accounting standards has been fundamentally a three-step process. First, accounting methods by country were documented. In the second step, international standards were developed that gave broad flexibility by allowing the most widely used methods. The third, and most important, step is the gradual elimination of alternative treatments. IASC should be commended for moving aggressively toward this third step. Its "benchmark" recommendations are clearly intended to enhance the comparability of financial statements used in the global marketplace.

Lawrence R. Hudack, PhD, CPA, is an associate professor of accounting at Indiana University of Pennsylvania. Brian C. McAllister, MBA, CPA, is an assistant professor of accounting, and Larry L. Orsini, MBA, CPA, a professor of accounting, both at St. Bonaventure University.



The CPA Journal is broadly recognized as an outstanding, technical-refereed publication aimed at public practitioners, management, educators, and other accounting professionals. It is edited by CPAs for CPAs. Our goal is to provide CPAs and other accounting professionals with the information and news to enable them to be successful accountants, managers, and executives in today's practice environments.

©2009 The New York State Society of CPAs. Legal Notices

Visit the new cpajournal.com.