Welcome to Luca!globe
 The CPA Journal Online Current Issue!    Navigation Tips!
Main Menu
CPA Journal
FAE
Professional Libary
Professional Forums
Member Services
Marketplace
Committees
Chapters
     Search
     Software
     Personal
     Help
Feb 1995

Market-timing is harder than it looks. (Personal Financial Planning)

by Feld, Alan R.

    Abstract- Many investors are convinced that good investing is just a matter of market-timing. To do well, they believe that all they have to do is know when a market is poised for growth and when it is about to decline. They think that this knowledge will allow them to be in the market when it is bullish and out of it when the market is bearish. This belief is erroneous. Although is true that investors can increase their return considerably if they can anticipate market upturns and downturns accurately, market-timing is not as easy as many believe. To be able to be in the market at exactly the right periods, investors or their advisers will have to have exceptional forecasting abilities. Market-timing is an extremely difficult task because stock gains tend to come spasmodically and stocks are known return quickly to their previous highs and then rise even higher.

Think back no further than 1991 for a good example. The U.S. stock market had been down the year before, and many predicted another bad year - to mark the end of the Eighties, so to speak. Heedless of these warnings, stocks went ahead and climbed 26.3% not including dividends, making for one of the best years on record. But you had to be in the market consistently to reap the reward. A full two-thirds of it came in the 21 trading days beginning on January 16 - the most frightening day of the year, when Operation Desert Storm was launched; the rest came during the year-end holiday season. If you were on the sidelines during those few days - 28 out of a year's total of 253 - you missed all the appreciation of stocks in the best year of the Nineties to date.

Indeed, the main factor working against market timing is that stock gains tend to come in brief, intense bursts. Miss enough of them and you lose all the advantage that led you into stocks in the first place. Going back to 1926, U.S. stocks have returned eight tenths of a percent per month on average. During the best TABULAR DATA OMITTED 60 months in these 68 years - the best 7% of the time - the return averaged more than 11%. In all other months - the other 93% of the time - the return of stocks was almost nil.

Adding to the evidence against market-timing is the fact that it hasn't taken long in the past for stocks to return to their prior peaks and then climb higher. On average, post-war bear markets have lasted almost a year and returned to prior peak levels in eight months more. Even if you were unlucky enough to have bought into the market just before the sharp decline of 1987, you'd have been back at your initial value a year and a half later with dividends reinvested - unless you sold out, that is. By midyear 1994, you'd have been up another 75%. Periodic descents are a fact of life in stock investing, but the more potent reality is the long-term climb.

ILLUSTRATION OMITTED

EXHIBIT2

ANALYSISOFMARKETGAINS

Stockreturnstendtocomeinbriefbursts;missenoughofthemand

youlosealltheadvantage.

1991S&P500Numberof

AppreciationTradingDays

EntireYear26.3%253

Jan16-Feb1317.621

Last7Days9.07

Restof1991(1.5)225

1926-92PercentofAverage

AllMonthsMonthlyReturn

S&P500totalreturn:

816months100%0.82%

Best60months711.06

Allothermonths930.01

Source:Bersteinestimates



The CPA Journal is broadly recognized as an outstanding, technical-refereed publication aimed at public practitioners, management, educators, and other accounting professionals. It is edited by CPAs for CPAs. Our goal is to provide CPAs and other accounting professionals with the information and news to enable them to be successful accountants, managers, and executives in today's practice environments.

©2009 The New York State Society of CPAs. Legal Notices

Visit the new cpajournal.com.