|
|||||
|
|||||
Search Software Personal Help |
The Technical Issues Committee (TIC) of the AICPA Private Companies Practice Section recently expressed concern with the GASB's proposed new accounting model for state and local governments. Specifically, TIC feels that some of the proposals will make these engagements, which are already complex and intricate, even more complicated and costly for practitioners and their government clients.
According to TIC, one of the most critical issues involves dual presentation. The GASB proposal, Government Financial Reporting Model: Core Financial Statements, suggests requiring that core financial statements be prepared from both an entity-wide perspective and a fund perspective. Many governments and public officials find it difficult to understand the current financial reporting model and, in the TIC's opinion, the new dual perspective will not improve comprehension. At the same time, dual presentation could significantly increase costs for smaller governments because it would force auditors to perform additional procedures.
The proposal also sets minimum requirements for management discussion and analysis (MD&A) in government financial statements. Although the information included in MD&A can be worthwhile for users, TIC thinks the preparation of this report may prove burdensome and costly for many
The TIC believes it is possible to present worthwhile information without increasing expense or complexity. While elements such as management's discussion and analysis, financial statements prepared on an entity-wide basis or fund basis, notes to the financial statements, and required supplementary information are important, the TIC recommends that governments be allowed to select which ones are relevant to their own particular users, based on negotiation with those users. The TIC also suggests presenting a cash flows statement at the entity-wide level, and believes governments should continue to have the option of using either the direct or indirect method. Finally, it has recommended summary footnote disclosure of budget information, including noncompliance with legally adopted budgets.
TIC is concerned that, as a result of the proposals, some governments may choose to prepare OCBOA financial statements, which would be less meaningful, rather than follow the GASB model. As an alternative, TIC believes that governments should be allowed a larger range of options in terms of what they present in financial statements, which would be consistent with the direction presented by the AICPA Special Committee on Financial Reporting. *
©2009 The New York State Society of CPAs. Legal Notices |
Visit the new cpajournal.com.