|
|||||
|
|||||
Search Software Personal Help |
Some practitioners go to the trouble of obtaining a "proof of mailing" from
the post office when mailing important matters to the IRS. Other
practitioners insist on registered mail. Who's most correct? It depends on
what circuit the taxpayer lives in. The Second and Sixth Circuits would
require registered mail to establish delivery to the IRS. The Eighth and
Ninth would not. The importance of the difference is emphasized by a recent
Sixth Circuit case, in which the court reaffirmed its rejection of the
common law "mailbox rule."
The court held that the mailbox rule is overridden by I.R.C. sec. 7502.
Under the mailbox rule, proof of mailing of a properly addressed
communication bearing proper postage raises a rebuttable presumption that
the communication was received in due course. Section 7502, on the other
hand, says that a communication mailed on or before a filing date and
delivered after the date will be deemed timely filed if it bears a postmark
not later than the filing date. Section 7502 goes on to state that
registered mail that is registered on or before the filing date is prima
facie evidence of delivery to the IRS.
In the recent case, the taxpayer had signed and mailed an S corporation
election form 54 days before it was due. But the IRS claimed it never
received the form. In the Eighth and Ninth Circuits, the application of the
mailbox rule would mean that the election had been properly filed. But the
Sixth Circuit reaffirmed that in its area, the taxpayers needed to use
registered mail. The S corporation election was, therefore, invalid.
Getting back to the original question, which practitioner's approach is
best? Although proof of mailing may be sufficient in some parts of the
country, clearly the most prudent approach is to send important
communications to the IRS using registered mail, return receipt requested. A
holding of prima facie evidence is nice to have on your side. A good office
practice if this approach is used is to have the type of communication, for
instance the form number, typed in the margin of the green return receipt
card.
Source: Carroll v. Commissioner, __ F.3d __ (6th Cir. 12/26/95).
The
CPA Journal is broadly recognized as an outstanding, technical-refereed
publication aimed at public practitioners, management, educators, and
other accounting professionals. It is edited by CPAs for CPAs. Our goal
is to provide CPAs and other accounting professionals with the information
and news to enable them to be successful accountants, managers, and
executives in today's practice environments.
©2009 The New York State Society of CPAs. Legal Notices |
Visit the new cpajournal.com.