|
|||||
|
|||||
Search Software Personal Help |
By Barbara A. Theisen CPAs have come to rely on computers to perform routine accounting functions,
tax planning and return preparation, forecasting, and audit testing. While
these uses remain dominant for now, employing computers as communication
tools is fast becoming a practice necessity. Many CPAs use networks and
modems to transmit and access data‹electronic mail and thousands of databases.
This allows access to information, clients, and co-workers when working
in a remote location. The combination of computers as communication devices and the growing
need for flexible working hours will lead to increased telecommuting within
the accounting profession. Telecommuters have been defined to be part-
or full-time employees who regularly use computers and telecommunications
equipment to work at home or at a designated remote site at least one day
a week. Telecommuting as a job option has grown considerably since the 1980s.
Some companies, such as IBM, undertook pilot programs to determine the
feasibility of telecommuting, while other businesses began offering the
option of working off-site with computer linkups. Historically, about 80%
of telecommuters have worked for companies with fewer than 100 employees.
The fastest growing programs are now in very small businesses--those with
less than 10 employees--and in companies with more than 100 employees.
Not all jobs lend themselves to telecommuting. Studies have shown that
output tasks based on relatively self-contained jobs producing specific
pieces of work, such as the work product of accountants, are most suitable
for telecommuting. Despite the relative absence of telecommuters in accounting
firms, many factors noted by businesses adopting telecommuting, e.g., employee
turnover, the Family and Medical Leave Act, overhead costs, and use of
non-peak computer hours, are also present within the accounting profession.
Balancing work and family commitments has become increasingly important
to both men and women in the profession, especially younger employees.
Many firms have already addressed requests from employees for flex time
or temporary part-time schedules to accommodate child care or health needs.
For the most part these requests are handled individually; although a growing
number of firms have adopted policies addressing these needs. Some firms
find that allowing employees at all levels to occasionally arrange part
of their work time as telecommuters may be an effective way to reduce costs,
improve the workplace quality of life, and eliminate unnecessary turnover
of valued workers. Telecommuting can provide significant improvements to workplace quality
of life for both employees and employers. Telecommuting can serve as an
alternative to the Family and Medical Leave Act because it allows an employee
who might otherwise take unpaid leave to earn a paycheck while working
at home. Employer benefits range from lower overhead costs to improved
employee morale and retention. Telecommuting has enabled employers to improve
their achievement of affirmative action goals, facilitating employment
for disabled workers, and assisting women in returning to work following
maternity leave. Employers utilizing telecommuting customarily note that improved productivity
and lower overhead costs, such as reduced office rents and use of non-peak
computer hours, are significant advantages for their businesses. In fact,
improvements in productivity are the most frequently reported outcomes
of telecommuting programs. Surveys have reported business productivity
gains between 10% and 100%, with the average being 30%. Some reasons are
telecommuting employees work at times of day when they are most productive,
they tend to finish projects ahead of schedule, and they often work for
longer periods of time without interruptions. Employees working at home
are often more available for consultations with their clients and supervisors
by phone or by e-mail than they are when working in the office. Of course,
not all job responsibilities can be performed away from the office, and
on-site visits with clients will continue to be an important and necessary
service. Nonetheless, accounting firms may benefit significantly by using
telecommuting to expand the work options of their employees. The costs of losing an experienced employee and recruiting and training
a new worker are well known in accounting firms, where continuing education
programs can be very costly. As a result, telecommuting is one option now
seriously considered by firms wishing to retain valued employees. For example,
KPMG Peat Marwick announced its intention to offer flexible work schedules
and work at home options to all of its full-time employees. Other firms
are examining these options as well. Adopting telecommuting requires commitments from both employer and the
employee. The firm must have adequate computer technology and equipment
capabilities; it must identify appropriate tasks and employees to perform
those tasks; and, it must possess or establish a support structure for
telecommuting within the firm. Many accounting firms already have much of the necessary computer equipment,
including modems, fax machines, and CD-ROM equipment, making the capital
outlay minimal. Many accountants already own computers and modems for home
use, and other home products needed for telecommuting are widely available
and easily installed. Once the necessary equipment is in place, the employer
must identify the appropriate tasks and the employees to perform those
tasks. Some jobs lend themselves to working off-site, such as write-up
work, tax return preparation, and computer data testing in off-peak hours.
Other assignments, such as financial statement audits and consulting, require
extensive client interaction and are less suitable for telecommuting, although
certain aspects of these jobs can be done off-site. Protecting the security
of client data is a major concern when identifying the tasks to be done
at a remote location. Unless management believes in the benefits of telecommuting and supports
it, even on a limited basis, telecommuting will likely fail. The support
structure requires that managers and supervisors be sufficiently trained
in overseeing work assignments and performing evaluations of workers they
do not see every day. Organizations that dropped telecommuting as a work
option usually cite poor management and inadequate communication between
managers and telecommuters as the primary reasons. Initially, many accounting
firms may choose to implement the program, selectively offering the option
to those employees best suited for the arrangement. Employees working as telecommuters should have certain skills and experience.
They must have technical skills; possess good communication, organizational,
and computer skills; and be self-directed and self-starting. They must
also have earned the confidence of clients, co-workers, and management.
It would be rare to have interns or staff people with less than supervisory
experience as telecommuters, although paraprofessionals preparing tax returns
might be an exception. Most telecommuters need to maintain core times for availability to clients,
co-workers, and supervisors. They may also need to spend more time in the
office or at client locations during peak seasons, while increasing their
telecommuting in slower months. Finally, an employee must want to be a
telecommuter. Researchers have found that the most successful telecommuters
are those that choose the option because it allows them to combine work
with another valued goal, such as pursuing a graduate degree or caring
for a child or parent. Studies have shown that employees place a high value
on having the flexibility to attend a class or visit a child's school during
the day while completing their work assignments at alternate times convenient
to their employers. Despite many advantages, telecommuting does have associated costs. For
firms that lack adequate hardware, software, or experience in computer
applications and communication packages, start-up costs can be significant.
Equipment maintenance and insurance must also be considered. Firms that
do not yet own the necessary equipment and programs, however, must weigh
the additional costs against the benefits of retaining experienced employees
who might otherwise leave due to inflexible work options. To determine whether telecommuting is a viable option, a firm might
wish to implement a pilot program starting in its nonpeak months. Most
pilot programs last between 6 and 18 months. Pilot programs help to determine
what additional training and equipment are needed, the associated costs,
and the most appropriate work to be performed away from the firm and client
offices. Employees participating in a pilot program should be volunteers,
with sufficient experience and training in accounting, computer, and interpersonal
skills. At the end of the pilot program, employee attitudes, changes in
productivity, and other benchmarks should be measured and evaluated by
management. From an employee's perspective, telecommuting means becoming proficient
in the accounting, tax, computer, and communication programs used by the
firm. Because learning these programs is generally considered to be part
of their job training, most employees do not view these requirements unfavorably.
More important costs may lie in the personalities and perceptions of
the employees themselves. If an employee feels isolated, misses the social
and professional interaction with colleagues, fears being overlooked for
raises and promotions, or experiences conflict at home over the use of
space and time for work, then he or she may choose not to be a telecommuter
or may do so only periodically. Telecommuting is not the best option for
everyone. Perhaps the most significant problem that firms may encounter in implementing
telecommuting is resistance to change by partners and managers. Most partners
and managers are already experienced in overseeing employees on- and off-site
and handling several clients at one time‹the supervision of telecommuters
should be similar to current practice. Perceived loss of control and failure to trust employees working at
home may be large hurdles to overcome in some firms, even when the benefits
outweigh the costs. This attitude may be exacerbated in firms that perceive
women as being the most likely employees to choose telecommuting as a work
option, due to child-care responsibilities. Despite the fact that at least
50% of the college accounting graduates for the last several years have
been women, attitudes toward women as employees have been somewhat slow
to change. For example, in a recent survey of CPAs by the New York State
Society of CPAs' Advancement of Women in the Accounting Profession Committee,
nearly 40% of managing partners responding said they felt firms should
not have to change to meet the needs of women CPAs. Fortunately, most CPAs
do not share this opinion, and the significant increase in women CPAs in
the last decade and the creation of high-level committees to address their
needs suggest that firms will want to find ways in which to retain experienced
women employees. Interestingly, a 1992 study showed that telecommuters
were slightly more likely to be male than female, although the actual mix
varied by company. The real problem may be the perception that those working at home part
of the time are not as dedicated or hard-working as those spending all
of their time at the office or with clients. If this attitude persists,
the telecommuter may indeed risk receiving slower promotions or losing
them altogether. For example, a recent internal study conducted by Deloitte
& Touche found that, despite the existence of flex time programs within
the firm, the firm lacked an environment that supported these programs.
Consequently, many employees felt that choosing a flex time option would
have a significantly adverse effect on their careers, and few were willing
to take that risk. Management can help to reduce the resistance to alternative work options
such as telecommuting by 1) identifying the job assignments best suited
for telecommuting, 2) establishing core times when telecommuters must be
available for client or co-worker consultations, 3) setting policies as
to the number of days per week to be spent at home 4) reducing or eliminating
telecommuting as an option during busy season if this is suitable for the
firm, and 5) making telecommuting an option available to male and female
employees once they have mastered sufficient technical, computer, and organizational
skills. Yet even with these steps, the bottom line remains that telecommuting
will succeed only with the support of management. If the partners are supportive,
the rest of the firm will likely follow suit. * Barbara A. Theisen is associate professor of accounting at
Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan. Editor: OCTOBER 1995 / THE CPA JOURNAL
The
CPA Journal is broadly recognized as an outstanding, technical-refereed
publication aimed at public practitioners, management, educators, and
other accounting professionals. It is edited by CPAs for CPAs. Our goal
is to provide CPAs and other accounting professionals with the information
and news to enable them to be successful accountants, managers, and
executives in today's practice environments.
©2009 The New York State Society of CPAs. Legal Notices |
Visit the new cpajournal.com.